EduKational Health Article
The importance of an individually suitable Balanced Diet cannot be overstated
Read more here:
Should humans drink cow’s milk?
The consumption of cow’s milk is in decline as lactose intolerance does for dairy what gluten intolerance has done to bread. But if you are northern European, you are genetically modified to consume milk
Red meats and cancer risk
Recent study causes controversy over cancer risk from eating red meat
ew research that claims red and processed meat is probably not harmful to our health has caused controversy among experts who maintain people should cut down on their consumption for health reasons.
The World Health Organization has classified red and processed meats as cancer-causing. Public health bodies worldwide urge people to limit their intake of red and processed meat to reduce their cancer risk. The United Kingdom's National Health Service advises that people who eat 90g of meat a day - equivalent to three thin slices of roast meat - should cut down to 70g.
Worldwide, calls are multiplying for people to cut back on meat consumption because of, aside from public health issues, the climate emergency and the greenhouse gas emissions that come from animal farming.
Read our article on red meat and cancer here:
Facts on red meat and cancer
However the international team, led by Bradley Johnston, Associate Professor of Community Health at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada, concluded that those who like meat should not stop on health grounds. Johnson said, "Based on the research, we cannot say with any certainty that eating red or processed meat causes cancer, diabetes or heart disease".
Many scientists agreed with the teams findings that evidence from studies around the world was generally poor. Some said that left the findings open to both
interpretation - either that meat could cause harm to health or that it did not.
Other scientists said Johnston and his colleagues were wrong to exclude environmental concerns about damage to the planet from clearing forests and animal farming from their work.
The lead author of the EAT-Lancet Commission, which in January 2019 advocated a plant-based diet for both environmental sustainability and health, roundly criticised the new research.
This report has layers of flaws and is the most egregious abuse of evidence that I have ever seen".Walter Willett, Professor of epidemiology and nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health
Walter Willett, professor of epidemiology and nutrition at the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, who advocates a plant-based diet, said "This report has layers of flaws and is the most egregious abuse of evidence that I have ever seen".
Willet said many of the studies participants were young and unlikely to succumb to the described illness in the short time period involved in the trials. He added "The magnitude of risk reduction by replacing red meat with healthy protein sources is similar to that of many drugs we use for treating high blood cholesterol and blood pressure, and we spend massive amounts of money on this".
But the series of papers published in the American College of Physicians Annals of Internal Medicine journal used methodology most scientists said was thorough, pulling together data
from studies around the world and grading their results. The best studies were those in which similar participants were randomly allocated to one diet
"Among 12 randomised control trials enrolling about 54,000 individuals, we did not find a statistically significant or an important association in the risk of heart disease, cancer, or diabetes for those that consumed less red and processed meat," Johnston said.
In other, weaker studies involving millions of people, which simply observe the effects of people's usual diet, "we did find a small reduction in risk amongst those who consumed three fewer servings of red or processed meat per week. However, the certainty of evidence was low to very low," he said.
Dietary studies are notoriously difficult to do because people may not always eat what they say they do or may not remember.
Gunter Kuhnle, professor of nutrition and food science at the University of Reading in the UK, said the research was thorough
but that the weak evidence of possible harm should be taken into account.
"The data clearly shows that the while the association between meat and cancer does not have to be addressed urgently, it should not be ignored," he said. "Small dietary changes can mitigate the effect of red and processed meat on cancer risk, for example a high-fibre diet."
The World Cancer Research Fund, which warns of links between red and processed meat and bowel cancer, did not accept the new interpretation of the evidence.
"The message people need to hear is that we should be eating no more than three portions of red meat a week and avoiding processed meat altogether".Dr Giota Mitrou, Director of research The World Cancer Research Fund
Dr Giota Mitrou, director of research, said it "could be putting people at risk by suggesting they can eat as much red and processed meat as they like
without increasing their risk of cancer.
The message people need to hear is that we should be eating no more than three portions of red meat a week and avoiding processed meat altogether. We stand by our rigorous research of the last 30 years and urge the public to follow the current recommendations on red and processed meat."
Prof Louis Levy, head of nutrition science at National Health England, said: "Globally, the evidence indicates that people who eat red and processed meat
should limit their intake.
While it can form part of healthy diet, eating too much can increase your risk of developing bowel cancer. Following a healthy, balanced diet based on the Eatwell Guide is best for long-term health."
At EduKational Restaurant we strongly recommend that people follow the principles of a Individually suitable Balanced Diet containing as much, only
lightly processed, fresh foods as possible - Note: preparing and cooking is a form of food processing.
We advise against the consumption of highly processed and artificial foods in any form.
We also strongly recommend that before radically changing a diet the people seek advice from reputable clinicians or dietary experts, especially those with a pre-existing medical condition.
In addition we advocate that a good, healthy Balanced Diet be allied to a healthy lifestyle. Once again we recommend that people seek advice only from their doctor or other reputable clinicians and lifestyle experts.
At EduKational Restaurant we do not advocate taking any form of dietary supplements as an alternative to, or addition to a Healthy diet except on the express directions of their doctor for existing medical conditions.
For only natural Health Promoting foods